Dr. Miller is pissed and he has a right to be.

More griping from the sore loser's gallery. Bystander75 aka Garry Kanter is foaming at the mouth again. Read the article and come back here, I’ll wait for you:

http://blog.cleveland.com/sunmessenger/2011/11/south_euclid_council_president.html

OK. Welcome back. Let’s call bullshit on Garry’s post about "unfounded" allegations of racism. No one in went into a public forum and said the N-word. Even the anti-Oakwood people aren’t that stupid. But anyone who thinks there wasn’t a racist element to the anti-Oakwood group is blind, delusional, or in denial.

Click on this picture and read Rich Sones’ highlighted section here. It originally appeared on the Heights Observer blog but has been deleted. Cover-up, anyone?

When you have a candidate for city council office going to an anti-Oakwood meeting and saying he’s against Oakwood Commons because it will bring the “wrong element” to South Euclid, you don’t have to read between many lines to understand what he means. Especially when that same candidate has made it a personal hobby to be a pain in Dr. Miller’s ass. More so when that same candidate spat on a city worker after a shouting match. Even more so when his cronies at South Euclid Oversight post vandalized photos of Dr. Miller and Mayor Welo.

When you have anti-Oakwood people most of them not even from South Euclid, harassing yes on 96 people and telling them to go back to East Cleveland, that’s racism.

Just how many African-Americans in South Euclid or even Cleveland Heights opposed Issue 96? The only one I saw was in one of their silly videos.

You don’t have to spout the N-word to be a racist. There are people who will say “some of my best friends are black.” But they’ll lash out when their black “friends” get too “uppity.” And that’s exactly what happened with the anti-Oakwood crowd.

Miller may have a thin skin, and his language was rough. But his animosity for these peeps was justified.